Skip to content
AI Atlas

REVERSAL-BENCH: A Reversibility Axis and Reset Oracle for Measuring the Reset-Free RL Cliff

Published 17 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.17745

data quality92

Updated 8 h ago · first seen 17 Sept 2026

paper_01M2Q5C6F6QP4W9HRRF1AZXZTS

Abstract

A central goal of autonomous reinforcement learning is continuous policy training without external resets. However, existing paradigms largely depend on underlying environmental reversibility, a property absent in real world manipulation, where events such as pushing objects off tables or spilling granular substances cannot be undone. We introduce REVERSAL-BENCH, a benchmark that controls reversibility via a continuous parameter $\rho \in [0, 1]$ and provides a reset oracle, a ground-truth verification mechanism to test state recoverability across eight manipulation settings in five physics engines. Evaluating a broad spectrum of policy architectures, including standard actor-critic algorithms, safe RL, and specialized reset-free frameworks, reveals a sharp reversibility cliff: reset-free agents are consistently absorbed into irrecoverable states as $\rho$ increases, whereas episodic agents maintain steady learning. We see this failure mode across autonomous reset-free baselines and constrained RL. Because reset-free agents lack external resets, any transition into an irrecoverable state results in permanent absorption, leaving the agent trapped where further learning halts. We show that this absorption phenomenon persists in full physics simulations under learned manipulation policies. By evaluating against geometrically identical reversible counterparts, we confirm that this breakdown is causally driven by irreversibility rather than obstacle complexity. We release the benchmark suite, a large multi-simulator dataset labeled with recoverability and a reset oracle. We also evaluate a safety shield that intervenes before irreversible failures occur, showing that while recoverability can be predicted accurately, active recovery primarily succeeds only when the agent can physically steer clear of the trap

Authors

Authors 2

Chandru VenkataramanRiyaaz Shaik

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 2

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 3

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 4

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.AI feedT1· Official7 h ago7
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.LG feedT1· Official7 h ago6
Apple Machine Learning Researchmachinelearning.apple.com/research/reversal-bench-rl-cliff paper_pageT1· Official8 h ago1
Apple Machine Learning Researchmachinelearning.apple.com/rss.xml feedT1· Official8 h ago2

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.