Skip to content
AI Atlas
PaperActive

LLMs Are Not (Consistently) Bayesian: Quantifying Internal (In)consistencies of LLMs’ Probabilistic Beliefs

Applearxiv.org/pdf/2605.06915

Updated 52 min ago · first seen 11 Sept 2026

paper_01M294AHM2Z9JAPGE6SY4ZN50T

Published
28 Aug 2026
T1 · 53 min ago
arXiv
2605.06915
T1 · 52 min ago

Abstract

Modern AI systems are being deployed in complex domains such as medicine, science, and law, where there is often not a single correct answer given the observed evidence. Such systems must be able to represent and update uncertain beliefs about the world as new evidence arrives to make rational decisions. We introduce the novel technique of studying LLMs as information processing rules and utilize the information processing gap—the deviation from Bayes updates—to study the internal (in)consistencies of how LLMs update their probabilistic beliefs from evidence. Our extensive experiments evaluate…

Authors 7

Chacha Chen, Matthew Jörke, Adam Goliński, Masha Fedzechkina, Guillermo Sapiro, Sinead Williamson, Nicholas Foti

Specification

arXiv id
2605.06915

Source:Apple Machine Learning ResearchT1observed 52 min agohigh

PDF

Source:Apple Machine Learning ResearchT1observed 52 min agohigh

Published
28 Aug 2026

Source:Apple Machine Learning ResearchT1observed 53 min agohigh

Each value shows its source, tier and observation time. Conflicting claims are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. How AI Atlas records facts →

Provenance

Attributed facts

6

Source tiers

T16

Freshest observation

52 min ago

Conflicts

None