Skip to content
AI Atlas
PaperActive

Unadapted Multilingual ASR on a Garrusi Kurdish Evaluation Set: A Common-Reference Staged Normalization Analysis

arxiv.org/abs/2608.16379

quality89

Updated 3 h ago · first seen 11 Sept 2026

paper_01M294G64HTRN6Y8T51JT1DZVJ

Published
11 Sept 2026
T1 · 3 h ago
arXiv
2608.16379
T1 · 3 h ago
Category
cs.CL
T1 · 3 h ago

Abstract

Evaluating speech recognition for a Kurdish variety written in a Latin field orthography, using a model that outputs Arabic script, creates a measurement problem before a modelling one: direct scoring treats writing-system differences as recognition errors. Jointly normalizing reference and hypothesis avoids this, but also changes reference tokenization, mixing agreement gains with a change in the scoring denominator. I evaluate MMS-1B-all with the Central Kurdish (ckb) adapter, used as released without adaptation, on 1,722 Garrusi questionnaire segments from five speakers (9,763 reference word tokens; 117.9 minutes). I use a common-reference design: the reference is folded once and fixed at 9,763 tokens, while only the hypothesis representation varies. The raw Arabic-script hypothesis scores 111.70% WER and 100.92% CER, with zero exact word matches. Latin transliteration gives 102.36% WER and 57.89% CER; folding it into the reference's reduced orthography gives 97.85% and 51.20%. Thus RAW-to-FOLDED reduces measured WER by 13.85 points and CER by 49.72 points; folding alone accounts for 4.51 and 6.69 points. Substantial error remains: 14.53% of reference tokens are exact matches, edits are substitution-dominated, and per-segment WER is higher for shorter segments. A Southern Kurdish fine-tuned system (aranemini/southern-kurdish-asr), scored under the same design, performs worse on every speaker (1,703 segments), with 109.56% WER and 55.85% CER. However, 12,330 output characters fall outside the folding table, so these rates must be recomputed against the corrected fixed reference. The MMS output also contains 613 unconverted or unmapped characters, showing that part of the residual error reflects scoring-pipeline limits rather than recognition alone. I will release the fixed reference and segment-level results, subject to source-corpus sharing terms, to support independent checking.

Authors 1

Hiwa Asadpour

Specification

Official page

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 3 h agohigh

Arxiv announce type
replace

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 3 h agohigh

arXiv id
2608.16379

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 3 h agohigh

Categories
cs.CL, cs.SD

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 3 h agohigh

PDF

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 3 h agohigh

Primary category
cs.CL

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 3 h agohigh

Published
11 Sept 2026

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 3 h agohigh

Each value shows its source, tier and observation time. Conflicting claims are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. How AI Atlas records facts →

Provenance

Attributed facts

9

Source tiers

T19

Freshest observation

3 h ago

Conflicts

None