Skip to content
AI Atlas

TwinICL: Diagnosing Multimodal In-Context Learning through Paired Counterfactuals

Published 15 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.15028

data quality89

Updated 24 h ago · first seen 15 Sept 2026

paper_01M2JK0CSWMQPKBJ4R5EQY72YE

Abstract

In-context learning (ICL) enables models to infer tasks from demonstrations, but existing benchmarks generally lack matched text and image versions needed to compare ICL performance across modalities. We introduce TwinICL, a procedurally generated benchmark providing such pairs for controlled comparison. Across six open-weight models and 38 tasks, multimodal ICL consistently underperforms text-only ICL, with gaps varying by task family. To test whether this gap can be recovered, we target visual access, task framing, and reasoning through three interventions. Their combination recovers strong multimodal ICL performance on a diagnostic subset, despite limited or inconsistent individual effects. To distinguish difficulties in executing tasks from those in inferring them, we evaluate models with explicit task instructions, revealing a modality gap even when the task is known. We then examine how adding demonstration inputs and outputs reshapes this gap, highlighting demonstrations' dual role as additional context to process and evidence about the task. The dataset is available at https://github.com/lab-flair/TwinICL.

Authors

Authors 8

Hsuan-Tien LinI-Hung HsuKuan-Hao HuangNanyun PengPo-Yi LuSerhii HoncharenkoZih-Ching ChenZihan Xue

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 0

No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 2

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 2

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.CV feedT1· Official7 h ago4
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.LG feedT1· Official7 h ago4

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.