Skip to content
AI Atlas

TryOnReward: Learning Foveated Consistency for Reinforcement Fine-Tuning of Virtual Try-On

Published 15 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.13259

data quality89

Updated 29 h ago · first seen 15 Sept 2026

paper_01M2JK197EFYW0Q6WNGGTRKHWV

Abstract

Virtual Try-On (VTON) aims to dress a person with the reference garment, producing visually reasonable results aligned with human preferences. Turning this preference-oriented goal into an actionable objective relies on a scoring function aligned with human taste. However, classic fidelity metrics exhibit weak correlation with human judgments, and generic VLMs fail to provide the discriminative granularity demanded by try-on quality evaluation, which hinges on faithfully preserving garment and person details. This shortcoming is further exacerbated in the reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) optimization and leads to severe reward hacking. To this end, we present TryOnReward, a fine-grained reward model tailored for VTON. Built on a vision-language backbone, it adopts a foveation calibration objective that grounds each quality dimension in the relevant region to avoid global shortcut learning. Meanwhile, TryOnReward jointly optimizes pairwise preferences and per-dimension quality scores via margin-aware supervision, leveraging both relative and absolute quality signals. For model training and evaluation, we build TryOnReward-100K, a human-annotated per-dimension rating dataset, alongside TryOn-Bench and TryOnRewardBench, two benchmarks covering diverse real scenarios. Extensive experiments confirm that TryOnReward significantly outperforms generic judges in human preference alignment, and when serving as the RFT reward function, it consistently yields human-preferred try-on results across multiple baselines.

Authors

Authors 8

Chengjun XieSimiu GuWen XueXiaolong FuXueheng LiYan LiYipeng SunYong Liu

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 0

No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 2

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 2

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.CV feedT1· Official21 h ago3
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.AI feedT1· Official21 h ago4

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.