Toward Reliable Railway-Bogie Response Prediction Using Multifidelity TDNN and Physics-Informed Residual Learning
Published 15 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.12018
Updated 26 h ago · first seen 14 Sept 2026
paper_01M2F4Z1B00DADH9MXY98XK7BD
Abstract
Railway engineers need simulation models that predict vehicle responses across operating scenarios that cannot be tested exhaustively. Agreement with representative measurements provides essential evidence, but calibration at a limited set of conditions does not guarantee accuracy elsewhere. We present a multifidelity railway-bogie response-correction method that treats multibody simulation histories as low-fidelity information and roller-rig measurements as high-fidelity evidence. This method combines an experiment-anchored fidelity assignment with physics-informed discrepancy learning for multichannel bogie-response histories. A time-delay neural network (TDNN) represents the condition-dependent simulation trend, and development-fitted amplitude alignment defines the low-fidelity baseline. A residual-correction network then models the reproducible response component not explained by this baseline and adds it to the baseline. An effective dynamic-balance equation constrains the learned discrepancy by representing differences in inertia, damping, stiffness, and external forcing between the simulated and physical systems. The training objective combines this constraint with residual matching, temporal smoothness, and a combined channel-2 acceleration loss selected using displacement-acceleration consistency evidence. For the evaluated reconstruction case, the corrected response gives a mean coefficient of determination of 0.8197, a mean normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) of 4.6055 %, and a mean normalized mean absolute error (NMAE) of 1.9297 %. These results provide initial evidence of accurate response prediction at the held-out 385 km/h condition.
Organizations
Organizations 0
No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.
Models
Models introduced or described 0
Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.
No model links this paper yet
Datasets
Datasets used 0
No dataset relation recorded.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks used 0
No benchmark relation recorded.
Code
Repositories & frameworks 0
No repository linked.
Timeline
Timeline 4
- Property changedPaperToward Reliable Railway-Bogie Response Prediction Using Multifidelity TDNN and Physics-Informed Residual Learning
Toward Reliable Railway-Bogie Response Prediction Using Multifidelity TDNN and Physics-Informed Residual Learning: arxiv announce type changed from new to replace
Arxiv announce typenew→replacearxiv - Property changedPaperToward Reliable Railway-Bogie Response Prediction Using Multifidelity TDNN and Physics-Informed Residual Learning
Toward Reliable Railway-Bogie Response Prediction Using Multifidelity TDNN and Physics-Informed Residual Learning: published at changed from 2026-09-14T04:00:00+00:00 to 2026-09-15T04:00:00+00:00
Published14 Sept 2026→15 Sept 2026arxiv - Property changedPaperToward Reliable Railway-Bogie Response Prediction Using Multifidelity TDNN and Physics-Informed Residual Learning
Toward Reliable Railway-Bogie Response Prediction Using Multifidelity TDNN and Physics-Informed Residual Learning: authors changed from ["Dongjin Lee", "Gyeolhee Lee", "Jaehun Kim", "Moosun Kim… to ["Changsung Jeon", "Dongjin Lee", "Gyeolhee Lee", "Jaehun…
AuthorsDongjin Lee, Gyeolhee Lee, Jaehun Kim, Moosun Kim, Taewook Kwon→Changsung Jeon, Dongjin Lee, Gyeolhee Lee, Jaehun Kim, Moosun Kim, Taewook Kwonarxiv - New paperPaperToward Reliable Railway-Bogie Response Prediction Using Multifidelity TDNN and Physics-Informed Residual Learning
New paper: Toward Reliable Railway-Bogie Response Prediction Using Multifidelity TDNN and Physics-Informed Residual Learning
arxiv
Sources
Sources 1
Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.