Skip to content
AI Atlas
Papercs.AI

Toward a Decision-Assurance Layer for AI-Assisted Flight Planning in Air Traffic Management

Published 15 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.13552

data quality89

Updated 29 h ago · first seen 15 Sept 2026

paper_01M2JK1919SDH18V7T52962PH9

Abstract

Generative AI is increasingly being used informally in Air Traffic Management (ATM) for tasks such as flight plan generation, trajectory interpretation, and constraint checking. Although these tools can reduce workload and accelerate planning, their non-deterministic outputs create safety and operational risks in human-in-the-loop settings. This paper proposes the AI Trust and Assurance Layer (ATAL), a model-agnostic decision assurance architecture that evaluates whether AI-generated flight-planning outputs are sufficiently reliable for operational use. ATAL combines semantic stability under prompt variation, operational consistency of structured outputs, and normative constraint validation against domain rules, and maps these signals to a Decision Readiness Level (DRL) for human operators. An ATM-inspired experimental study shows how unsafe, inconsistent, or misleading outputs can be identified before influencing flight-plan validation or execution. Although demonstrated in aviation, the framework is also transferable to other safety-critical decision-support domains that require human oversight under regulatory constraints.

Authors

Authors 5

Alexandre Barreto (George Mason University)Cleiton Ataide (DECEA: Department of Airspace Control)Jorge Valverde-Rebaza (Tecnol\'ogico de Monterrey)Paulo Costa (George Mason University)Shou Matsumoto (George Mason University)

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 0

No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 1

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 1

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.AI feedT1· Official21 h ago4

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.