Skip to content
AI Atlas
Papercs.LG

Tackling Failure Modes of PINNs and PIKANs Using Conflict-Free Gradients

Published 15 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.14841

data quality89

Updated 29 h ago · first seen 15 Sept 2026

paper_01M2JK0BYCJ2ZEEZZ8GKZMWVDK

Abstract

Scientific machine learning methods such as physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) increasingly rely on domain decomposition for better scalability while solving partial differential equations (PDEs) over complex geometries, yet the resulting composite loss comprising residual, boundary, and interface terms is highly susceptible to conflicting gradients that degrade training. This work bridges domain decomposition with projection-based gradient surgery to systematically mitigate such conflicts in 2D and 3D settings. We evaluate two existing projection-based algorithms, PCGrad and ConFIG, and identify their performance degradation in specific scenarios such as 3D domains with multiple overlapping interfaces. To address this limitation, we propose Norm-PCGrad, a normalized variant that achieves state-of-the-art accuracy across a range of 2D and 3D domain decomposition problems. Across the benchmarks considered, Norm-PCGrad consistently achieves the lowest relative $L_2$ error compared to training without gradient surgery as well as to existing algorithms such as PCGrad and ConFIG, while incurring negligible additional computational overhead. To improve computational efficiency of domain decomposition frameworks such as Extended PINN (XPINN), we propose replacing vanilla PINNs in selected subdomains with separable architectures such as Separable PINN (SPINN), reducing the computational cost from quadratic (or cubic) to linear. We additionally demonstrate that gradient surgery extends to physics-informed Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (PIKANs), yielding substantial accuracy improvements for 3D domain decomposition and confirming the generality of the proposed approach across network architectures.

Authors

Authors 3

Ameya D. JagtapIrina TezaurSidharth S. Menon

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 0

No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 1

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 1

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.LG feedT1· Official21 h ago3

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.