Skip to content
AI Atlas

Studying quantization trade-offs for efficient inference deployment in machine translation

Published 15 Sept 2026arXiv:2607.29397

data quality89

Updated 31 h ago · first seen 15 Sept 2026

paper_01M2JK0TV47WSRQR9G84CQXRJK

Abstract

Deploying large language models in realistic server environments poses challenges, as the system needs to provide high-quality responses with low latency. Quantization is a common approach to reduce the memory footprint and improve inference efficiency, yet its impact on latency and throughput is rarely evaluated under controlled, orchestration-level workloads. In this work we study the quantization trade-offs of EuroLLM \citep{martins2025eurollm} across three model sizes ranging from 1.7B to 22B for efficient deployment on a single A100 or H100 GPU. We demonstrate that combining a document-chunking strategy with W4A8 or W8A8 quantization improves the latency-throughput Pareto-curve under a wide range of workloads. Furthermore, since standard machine translation (MT) benchmarks rely on isolated sentences and fail to capture long-context dynamics, we introduce a document-level evaluation based on DocHPLT \cite{o2025dochplt} to assess how text chunking strategies affect translation quality under quantization. Our results indicate that standard segment-level evaluation can potentially underestimate the interaction between quantization and long-context document translation, for some quantization formats, translation direction and models. Overall, our experiments show that the trade-off between inference efficiency and translation quality depends not only on the quantization format, but also on the choice of text chunking strategy.

Authors

Authors 5

Douglas OrrJim ZhaoKoen OostermeijerSohir MaskeyTeryn Jones

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 0

No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 1

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 1

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.CL feedT1· Official23 h ago3

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.