Skip to content
AI Atlas

ReCAST: Reward Credit Assignment across Timesteps for Online Diffusion Reinforcement

Published 16 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.13425

data quality89

Updated 12 h ago · first seen 15 Sept 2026

paper_01M2JK0BP5053XNX2PP1SRZDTB

Abstract

Training diffusion models with multiple rewards requires distinguishing user preference from reward informativeness. User preference determines how much each reward should contribute to the overall objective; reward informativeness determines when its feedback is useful during denoising. Some rewards can meaningfully evaluate a sample as soon as global structure emerges, but others become informative only when the sample is nearly clean. To address both questions jointly, we propose ReCAST (Reward Credit ASsignment across T}imesteps), the first method, to our knowledge, for per-reward, timestep-dependent credit assignment in diffusion reward fine-tuning. ReCAST separates user preferences from temporal allocation through a reward-by-timestep weight matrix $W$, whose row sums match the user-specified reward budgets $\lambda$, while its column sums are equal, assigning the same total weight to each denoising step. Under these marginal constraints, ReCAST allocates weight according to each reward's informativeness, quantified by its R\'enyi discriminability gain at each step. These gains telescope to the total discriminability between the reward-induced positive policy and the current policy, providing a basis for temporal credit assignment. We evaluate ReCAST by training SD3.5-Medium under two distinct four-reward settings, each across five reward budgets $\lambda$. ReCAST improves the training rewards in one setting and matches them in the other, improves every held-out judge in both, and is preferred by an independent LLM-as-a-Judge. Together, these results show that ReCAST yields improvements that generalize beyond the training rewards and support its core principle: assigning each reward greater weight at the denoising timesteps where its feedback is most informative.

Authors

Authors 4

Cho-Jui HsiehKuei-Chun KaoYihang ChenYuanhao Ban

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 0

No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 3

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 2

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.AI feedT1· Official7 h ago5
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.LG feedT1· Official7 h ago4

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.