Skip to content
AI Atlas

Protecting patient privacy in clinical foundation models: Technical and legal perspectives

Published 16 Sept 2026arXiv:2608.07705

data quality89

Updated 12 h ago · first seen 16 Sept 2026

paper_01M2MD8C00AGV9EYVX18G12YPY

Abstract

-cross Abstract: Clinical foundation models trained on large-scale patient data are increasingly used for decision support, screening, and public health planning. As deployment expands, privacy risk arises from model-mediated leakage, yet its prevalence and severity remain poorly quantified. Models can disclose sensitive training artifacts, enabling patient re-identification in ways not captured by data-handling controls alone. As a result, existing frameworks, including HIPAA and GDPR, offer limited protection against assessing and addressing. We propose a practical framework for assessing privacy risk in clinical foundation models, illustrate realistic leakage scenarios across deployment settings, map them to legal regimes, and outline complementary technical and legal mitigations. Our analysis provides a context-aware risk assessment grounded in realistic usage to preserve the value of medical foundation models while rigorously safeguarding patient privacy.

Authors

Authors 7

Corinna CoupetteEmily AlsentzerI. Glenn CohenLena StempfleMarzyeh GhassemiSana TonekaboniSasha Ronaghi

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 0

No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 1

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 1

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.LG feedT1· Official7 h ago4

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.