Skip to content
AI Atlas

Pre-PEFT Probing: Weight Statistics and Perturbation Robustness for Layer Selection in VLM Vision Encoders

Published 16 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.15229

data quality89

Updated 7 h ago · first seen 15 Sept 2026

paper_01M2JK19D0ZDS117N1TXCXASXR

Abstract

We propose a pre-fine-tuning probing method for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) layer selection, aiming to obtain more stable and higher gains with fewer trainable parameters when adapting large vision--language models (VLMs). Unlike the common practice of applying LoRA and other adapters to all layers at once---where layer selection often relies on heuristic rules---we focus on the vision encoder and directly evaluate the "adaptability'' of each Transformer layer. Specifically, we characterize each layer from two perspectives: (i) the statistical properties of its Q/K/V projection weights (e.g., norms and condition numbers); (ii) robustness under controlled parameter perturbations. We then systematically compare these indicators with the downstream performance gains brought by applying PEFT to a single layer. Across experiments covering seven benchmarks and five PEFT variants, we observe a consistent correlation: layers (or matrices) with larger weight norms and higher condition numbers are usually more robust to perturbations and are more likely to yield larger fine-tuning gains. These results show that distribution-statistics analysis and perturbation tests before fine-tuning can provide practical signals for adaptation-layer selection, thereby maintaining or improving performance while reducing trainable parameters.

Authors

Authors 4

Jiahua BaoJie LiuQingtao XiaSiyao Cheng

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 0

No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 4

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 2

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.CV feedT1· Official7 h ago4
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.AI feedT1· Official7 h ago5

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.