Skip to content
AI Atlas

On the disintegration of the stochastic majority vote: From PAC-Bayesian bounds to a self-bounding algorithm

Published 16 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.16803

Updated 11 h ago · first seen 16 Sept 2026

paper_01M2MD8BJM1D6H87WV40MRXHG6

Abstract

Weighted majority votes are central to many successful ensemble methods. PAC-Bayesian theory provides tight generalization guarantees for such models by analyzing the expected risk of stochastic classifiers, while analyzing the risk of deterministic majority votes relies on surrogate bounds. To avoid these surrogates, Zantedeschi et al. ( 2021) introduced guarantees for stochastic majority votes, but the resulting models remain randomized. In this paper, we propose a derandomization framework for stochastic majority votes. To do so, we apply recent advances in disintegrated PAC-Bayesian theory directly to the space of majority vote weight vectors, transforming stochastic guarantees into certificates for a single deterministic majority vote. We derive two families of high-probability generalization bounds, covering both data-independent and data-dependent constructions of the ensemble, which naturally lead to a self-bounding learning algorithm optimizing deterministic majority vote guarantees.

Authors

Authors 9

Amaury Habrard (LabHCBenjamin Leblanc (LabHCEmilie Morvant (LabHC)Guillaume Metzler (ERIC)Julien Bastian (LabHC)MALICE)Pascal Germain (LabHCPaul Viallard (MALT)UJM

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 0

No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 1

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 1

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.LG feedT1· Official11 h ago4

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.