Skip to content
AI Atlas
PaperActive

MetroLLM-Bench: Evaluating Language Models as Transit Kiosk Runtimes

arxiv.org/abs/2609.10016

Updated 42 min ago · first seen 11 Sept 2026

paper_01M294GN2ZGGQ72ZAB9NHD2RHS

Published
11 Sept 2026
T1 · 51 min ago
arXiv
2609.10016
T1 · 51 min ago
Category
cs.LG
T1 · 51 min ago

Abstract

We introduce MetroLLM-Bench, a 955-case benchmark for testing language models as the policy layer of a transit kiosk. It covers six real metro systems, ranging from 37 to 414 stations, and eleven categories that include routing, fare calculation, disruptions, accessibility, and adversarial input. In each case, the model must call structured tools and submit a machine-renderable terminal state containing an outcome, a per-ticket fare quote when applicable, and a kiosk action. Fourteen deterministic scoring components form Tier 1; eight semantic-quality components form Tier 2, six of which use a language-model judge. We report Tier 1 and the combined score of both tiers. A stratified 75/25 split reserves 717 cases for training-data generation and 238 for held-out evaluation. We evaluate twenty-six models from six vendors, of which twenty-three are ranked. On the held-out partition, a 4B Qwen 3.5 student trained through parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) exceeds both GPT-5.6 tiers on Tier 1 (91.3 against 90.6 and 90.0) and matches GPT-5.4 full at maximum reasoning effort (91.4), with a 2.6 GB Q4_K_M footprint. Larger 9B and 27B students provide no further Tier 1 improvement over the 4B student at this training scale. Across the four Qwen sizes, the PEFT gain over the corresponding base model decreases from +7.03 points at 2B (three training seeds) to -0.91 at 27B; every seed shows the same direction at every size. A deterministic rule-based baseline reaches 84.6 on Tier 1, with the remaining language-model advantage concentrated in policy adaptation, compound scenarios, accessibility, and temporal reasoning. Muse Glimmer 30B leads the composite ranking, and serving configuration alone moves the Qwen 3.5-to-3.8 comparison by 2.7 Tier 1 points. The benchmark, harness, reproduction guide, and fine-tuned students are released at https://github.com/continker/metrollm-bench.

Authors 1

Remco Hendriks (Continker)

Specification

Official page

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 51 min agohigh

Arxiv announce type
cross

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 51 min agohigh

arXiv id
2609.10016

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 51 min agohigh

Categories
cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.CL

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 51 min agohigh

Github repo
continker/metrollm-bench

Source:Hugging Face Hub (public pages, model cards, papers)T2observed 44 min agomedium

Hf paper url
https://huggingface.co/papers/2609.10016

Source:Hugging Face Hub (public pages, model cards, papers)T2observed 44 min agomedium

Github stars
0

Source:Hugging Face Hub (public pages, model cards, papers)T2observed 42 min agomedium

Hf comments
2

Source:Hugging Face Hub (public pages, model cards, papers)T2observed 42 min agomedium

Upvotes
3

Source:Hugging Face Hub (public pages, model cards, papers)T2observed 42 min agomedium

PDF

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 51 min agohigh

Primary category
cs.LG

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 51 min agohigh

Published
11 Sept 2026

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 51 min agohigh

Each value shows its source, tier and observation time. Conflicting claims are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. How AI Atlas records facts →

Provenance

Attributed facts

14

Source tiers

T1T29 / 5

Freshest observation

42 min ago

Conflicts

4 flagged