Skip to content
AI Atlas

Interpreting the predictions of neural network classification based on a Taylor Coefficient Analysis (TCA)

Published 14 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.12801

data quality89

Updated 3 d ago · first seen 14 Sept 2026

paper_01M2F500Q58DSMYBMB1A8BMRC4

Abstract

We introduce a rigid and comprehensive taxonomy and paradigm for characterizing the influence of the input feature space $X$ on the predictions $\hat{y}$ of a neural network (NN) used for event classification, based on a Taylor expansion of $\hat{y}$ in $X$. The complete process of introspection we refer to as Taylor Coefficient Analysis (TCA). Based on two simplistic example tasks, which can be easily understood and bencmarked, we illustrate the power of the TCA when it comes to revealing, what properties of $X$ have led to what value of $\hat{y}$, of a given NN model, building up intuition for the method. A more complex application is meant to represent $X$ of a typical classification task at a CERN LHC experiment. Based on this application, we play through the different levels of introspection that the TCA offers and discuss a number of practical aspects for a TCA application typical for the analysis of CERN LHC data. We conclude with a study to support the assumption that those properties of $X$ most relevant for tasks of the complexity typical for a CERN LHC experiment, are usually caught by a TCA up to the second order.

Authors

Authors 4

Artur MonschLars SowaMarkus KluteRoger Wolf

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 0

No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 1

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 1

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.AI feedT1· Official2 d ago3

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.