Skip to content
AI Atlas

ICON Decomposition: Auditing deep neural networks for shortcuts by decomposing layer-wise representations using concepts

Published 16 Sept 2026arXiv:2608.26083

Updated 28 h ago · first seen 16 Sept 2026

paper_01M2MD8BVPKNQ4798MEC30FFNH

Abstract

Deep neural networks often exploit spurious associations, a failure known as shortcut learning. Before deployment, models should be audited for reliance on a set of concepts, such as acquisition artifacts or demographics. Current methods, such as linear probes and concept activation vectors, measure reliance by asking whether each concept, in isolation, is decodable from a layer. Their scores therefore reflect not only reliance but also correlations in the audit dataset. We introduce Independent Canonical cONcept (ICON) decomposition, which quantifies the share of a layer's variance each concept explains, conditional on all other concepts and the outcome. ICON scores are variance shares, comparable across layers and between continuous and categorical concepts. ICON also reports the share the set leaves unexplained. On simulated data, ICON recovers the true importance more accurately than seven baselines. On skin-cancer and neuroimaging models, ICON distinguishes learned shortcuts from correlated concepts, confirmed by retraining and out-of-distribution tests.

Authors

Authors 10

Frederik PahdeKerstin RitterManuel PfeufferMarc-Andre SchulzMarco SimnacherMaximilian DreyerNys Tjade SiegelRoshan Prakash RaneSonja GrevenWojciech Samek

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 0

No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 1

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 1

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.LG feedT1· Official28 h ago4

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.