Skip to content
AI Atlas

Gap Entropy and Almost Instance-Wise Optimal Best-Arm Identification

Published 16 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.13703

data quality89

Updated 2 d ago · first seen 15 Sept 2026

paper_01M2JK0CDGY968ZDC55G40AKYF

Abstract

In the best-arm identification problem, we are given $n$ stochastic arms with unknown means and wish to identify the arm with the largest mean with probability at least $1-\delta$, using as few samples as possible. We consider independent Gaussian rewards with unit variance and means in $[0,1]$. Chen and Li [2016] conjectured that the instance-wise sample complexity of this problem is characterized by the gap entropy, up to an additive term arising from the two-arm problem. In this paper, we resolve their gap-entropy and almost instance-wise optimality conjectures. For an instance $I$, let $\Delta_{[i]}$ be the gap between the largest and the $i$-th largest mean, let $H(I)=\sum_{i=2}^{n}\Delta_{[i]}^{-2}$, and let Ent$(I)$ denote the entropy of the normalized complexities of its dyadic gap groups. For every $0<\delta<0.1$, we show that the order-oblivious instance-wise lower bound is $ {\Theta} (H(I)[\log(1/\delta)+Ent(I)]). $ We also give a single $\delta$-correct algorithm with expected sample complexity $ O ( H(I)[\log(1/\delta)+Ent(I)] +D\log(e+\log(e+D))),D=\Delta_{[2]}^{-2}, $ without prior knowledge of the gaps. Our lower bound removes the dyadic-gap and monotonicity restrictions of previous work, and our upper bound removes the additional polylogarithmic factor multiplying the two-arm term. Thus, a single algorithm attains the instance-wise lower bound up to an additive two-arm term. The main theorems have been formalized and proved in Lean 4.

Authors

Authors 3

Jiarui YaoJiaxi ZhaoXiangxin Zhou

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 0

No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 2

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 2

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.AI feedT1· Official4 h ago8
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.LG feedT1· Official4 h ago7

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.