Skip to content
AI Atlas

Forty Shades of Blue: Quality-Diversity Alignment via Mode-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning

Published 16 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.14896

data quality89

Updated 12 h ago · first seen 15 Sept 2026

paper_01M2JK0CRZ7FBJE92D3VC320J5

Abstract

A notable byproduct of LLM alignment training is mode collapse: the progressive loss of output diversity that narrows a model's expressivity at inference time. This degradation is especially limiting for applications requiring open-ended exploration and pluralistic perspectives, such as scientific ideation and creative writing. We present MoDA (Mode-conditioned Diversity Alignment), an online post-training RL algorithm that jointly optimizes generation quality and diversity, inspired by the coordination perspective in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL). MoDA trains a single shared LLM policy conditioned on abstract numbered roles, where each role acts as an agent competing to produce outputs distinct from the others. This formulation encourages mode-conditioned agents to explore complementary regions of the high-quality output space without requiring hand-crafted personas or architectural modifications. MoDA employs a prompt-adaptive quality gating mechanism that calibrates a reference quality threshold and grants diversity rewards only to responses that meet the threshold, preventing reward-hacking behaviors that compromise response quality. To study quality-diversity tradeoffs, we evaluate MoDA on a comprehensive suite of benchmarks spanning seven general capability tasks and four domain-specific diversity tasks in scientific ideation and creative writing. MoDA improves SBERT diversity by 265% on the Infinite-Chat held-out prompts, while increasing average general capability pass@1 by 10.3% over the Qwen3-8B baseline. Compared with the strongest DivPO baseline, MoDA improves SBERT diversity from 0.274 to 0.482 (+75.9%) and E-Vendi from 2.86 to 4.4 (+53.8%), while improving average general capability pass@1 by 7.0%. Overall, MoDA provides a drop-in alternative to standard post-training methods that preserves and expands the model's expressive output space while improving quality.

Authors

Authors 7

Hangoo KangJames Jihao LiuJiayi YuanLiwei JiangNatasha JaquesVikram IyerYejin Choi

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 0

No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 4

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 3

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.AI feedT1· Official7 h ago5
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.CL feedT1· Official7 h ago4
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.LG feedT1· Official7 h ago4

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.