Skip to content
AI Atlas
PaperActive

Epistemic orientation predicts legislative effectiveness among members of the US Congress

arxiv.org/abs/2609.11865

quality89

Updated 6 h ago · first seen 11 Sept 2026

paper_01M294G4XB4RS4NX71M164PA2Z

Published
11 Sept 2026
T1 · 6 h ago
arXiv
2609.11865
T1 · 6 h ago
Category
cs.CL
T1 · 6 h ago

Abstract

Truth and evidence-based communication provide important foundations for democratic governance, accountability, and collective decision-making. Prior work shows that evidence-oriented language in US congressional floor speeches has declined since the mid-1970s, alongside broader changes in legislative productivity and polarization. This study shifts the analysis from congressional sessions to individual members of Congress to examine whether epistemic orientation varies systematically across legislators and whether it relates to political behavior and legislative effectiveness. Using the Evidence-Minus-Intuition (EMI) score, we measure the relative prevalence of evidence-oriented versus intuition-oriented language in congressional floor speeches and Twitter posts. We link these measures to legislator-level data on ideology, institutional position, communication context, and Legislative Effectiveness Score (LES). The results show that more ideologically extreme members use less evidence-oriented language on the congressional floor. EMI also exhibits cross-platform consistency with members who use more evidence-oriented language in floor speeches also being more evidence-oriented on Twitter, although EMI is lower on Twitter overall. Finally, EMI in congressional speeches is positively associated with individual legislative effectiveness, even after accounting for ideology and extensive political, institutional, demographic, topical, and communication volume controls. These findings suggest that evidence-oriented language is not only an aggregate feature of congressional discourse but also a meaningful attribute of individual-level legislative communication and effectiveness.

Authors 3

Segun Aroyehun, Stephan Lewandowsky, David Garcia

Specification

Official page

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 6 h agohigh

Arxiv announce type
new

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 6 h agohigh

arXiv id
2609.11865

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 6 h agohigh

Categories
cs.CL

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 6 h agohigh

PDF

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 6 h agohigh

Primary category
cs.CL

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 6 h agohigh

Published
11 Sept 2026

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 6 h agohigh

Each value shows its source, tier and observation time. Conflicting claims are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. How AI Atlas records facts →

Provenance

Attributed facts

9

Source tiers

T19

Freshest observation

6 h ago

Conflicts

None