Skip to content
AI Atlas
PaperActive

EGGROLL, Unrolled: Understanding and Improving Low-Rank Evolution Strategies at Scale

arxiv.org/abs/2609.10980

Updated 15 min ago · first seen 11 Sept 2026

paper_01M294FNXNJGMXMH6604MBQD9K

Published
11 Sept 2026
T1 · 15 min ago
arXiv
2609.10980
T1 · 15 min ago
Category
cs.LG
T1 · 15 min ago

Abstract

EGGROLL makes evolution strategies (ES) practical for LLMs by replacing dense Gaussian weight perturbations with low-rank Gaussian products, often of rank one. This choice is computationally attractive but geometrically severe: each rank-one perturbation lies in a zero-volume subset of the ambient matrix space, despite having identity covariance. We characterize the mean EGGROLL update field at finite rank and nonzero perturbation radii, then analyze the error of its finite-population estimator. The population field is obtained by applying an explicit resolvent to the gradient of the objective smoothed by the perturbations. We show that the resolvent can introduce a nonconservative component and can reverse the local stability of an optimum. EGGROLL is nevertheless exact on every quadratic objective at every rank and radius. For smooth objectives, its first local finite-rank correction is $O(\sigma^2/r)$, and nonasymptotic bounds control the resulting field error under smoothness assumptions. Under a local affine model, rank-one perturbations increase the variance of the gradient estimator by only $\frac{2(m+n+1)}{mn+1}$ relative to dense Gaussian ES, or $0.098\%$ for a $4096\times4096$ matrix. We then introduce LOO-ROLL, a leave-one-out estimator that preserves the finite-rank population field while replacing EGGROLL's two antithetic evaluations per direction by one. At equal evaluation cost, LOO-ROLL halves estimator MSE in transformer blocks. At matched wall time across ten post-training settings and models up to 8B parameters, LOO-ROLL improves seven outcomes in individual paired tests, with no significant loss. On the GSM8K test set, accuracy increases from $38.1\%$ to $63.0\%$ at 0.6B and from $65.9\%$ to $80.0\%$ at 8B. Transformer measurements recover the predicted finite-rank variance, while the rank comparisons show no reproducible reward-based advantage for rank eight.

Authors 2

Ege C. Kaya, Abolfazl Hashemi

Specification

Official page

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 15 min agohigh

Arxiv announce type
new

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 15 min agohigh

arXiv id
2609.10980

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 15 min agohigh

Categories
cs.LG, cs.AI, math.OC

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 15 min agohigh

PDF

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 15 min agohigh

Primary category
cs.LG

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 15 min agohigh

Published
11 Sept 2026

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 15 min agohigh

Each value shows its source, tier and observation time. Conflicting claims are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. How AI Atlas records facts →

Provenance

Attributed facts

9

Source tiers

T19

Freshest observation

15 min ago

Conflicts

None