Distilling Foundation Models for Agentic What-If Reasoning:Cost, Latency, and Governance in a Hybrid LLM+SLM Architecture
Published 16 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.16091
Updated 6 h ago · first seen 16 Sept 2026
paper_01M2MD8AW0NN653DJP0652BK6B
Abstract
Tabular foundation models deliver strong zero-training predictive performance via in-context learning, but their high inference latency makes them impractical as hot-path decision backends in interactive agentic loops. We distill a TabPFN teacher into a compact feed-forward student across a business-decision simulation on UCI Adult and five OpenML benchmarks: the classification head compresses 53.2M parameters to 8,546 (6,220x); the deployed two-head loan pipeline compresses 111.4M parameters to 17,059 (6,532x). The student retains 95.4-100.5% accuracy and 96.8-100.0% AUC, with the lowest accuracy retention on credit-g at 95.4%; an alpha = 0 hard-label control shows that the teacher's soft targets provide a 2.1-7.0 AUC point gain.
Organizations
Organizations 0
No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.
Models
Models introduced or described 0
Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.
No model links this paper yet
Datasets
Datasets used 0
No dataset relation recorded.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks used 0
No benchmark relation recorded.
Code
Repositories & frameworks 0
No repository linked.
Timeline
Timeline 1
- New paperPaperDistilling Foundation Models for Agentic What-If Reasoning:Cost, Latency, and Governance in a Hybrid LLM+SLM Architecture
New paper: Distilling Foundation Models for Agentic What-If Reasoning:Cost, Latency, and Governance in a Hybrid LLM+SLM Architecture
arxiv
Sources
Sources 1
Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.