Skip to content
AI Atlas
PaperActive

Data Scarcity and Model Sparsity: Mixtures-of-Experts Overfit More to Repeated Data

arxiv.org/abs/2609.11917

Updated 23 min ago · first seen 11 Sept 2026

paper_01M294FPJHCWSE05SGFZ6ZK7NC

Published
11 Sept 2026
T1 · 23 min ago
arXiv
2609.11917
T1 · 23 min ago
Category
cs.LG
T1 · 23 min ago

Abstract

As the supply of human-written text is exhausted, it has become standard practice to repeat language model training data. Prior work has studied data repetition for densely activated Transformers, but the effects of data repetition remains largely unexplored for recently dominant sparse architectures such as Mixture-of-Experts (MoE), despite their increased compute efficiency. We vary data repetition rates across single- and multi-domain data mixes, and across MoE settings, including expert count and granularity. We consistently find, for models ranging from 80M to 1B active (8.5B total) parameters, that MoEs degrade more rapidly under data repetition. This effect increases with sparsity, dictated by total rather than active parameters. While 80M dense models can repeat data over 8x with minimal degradation, MoEs instead begin to suffer at 4x, and deteriorate rapidly, ceding their performance benefits in all-unique data settings to underperform dense models after 32x. We experiment with existing regularization methods as a potential remedy. We find that some methods, such as dropout, can mitigate overfitting. In particular, with strong masking-based regularization, MoEs are able to outperform dense models even when data is repeated more than 64 times. However, no method fully matches the performance of all-unique training data. Finally, we analyze internal mechanisms correlated with MoE overfitting in high repetition regimes, and find that MoE routing universally stabilizes early in training, and that expert specialization correlates with overfitting to repeated data. In sum, our work addresses the adverse interactions between sparsity and data repetition: we present evidence for the core mechanisms of overfitting and its potential remediation, and suggest promising avenues for future methods to reduce over-specialization in model parameters by disrupting memorization patterns.

Authors 5

Atindra Jha, Margaret Li, Jure Leskovec, Percy Liang, Luke Zettlemoyer

Specification

Official page

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 23 min agohigh

Arxiv announce type
cross

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 23 min agohigh

arXiv id
2609.11917

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 23 min agohigh

Categories
cs.LG, cs.CL

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 23 min agohigh

PDF

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 23 min agohigh

Primary category
cs.LG

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 23 min agohigh

Published
11 Sept 2026

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 23 min agohigh

Each value shows its source, tier and observation time. Conflicting claims are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. How AI Atlas records facts →

Provenance

Attributed facts

9

Source tiers

T19

Freshest observation

23 min ago

Conflicts

None