Comment on arXiv:2607.01233: Survivorship Bias in Published-Paper Baselines for Research-Idea Distributions
Published 16 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.15996
Updated 11 h ago · first seen 16 Sept 2026
paper_01M2MD8SE6JBVJFW5BPFMJCXK1
Abstract
Chen, Zhao, and Cohan introduce a valuable distributional evaluation of LLM-generated research ideas. This comment raises a narrower identification concern: their human baseline consists of published papers, whereas the LLM baseline consists of one-shot proposals. If bridge-like or synthesis-like ideas are relatively easy to generate but relatively unlikely to survive publication, then the published human baseline will understate their prevalence in the unseen human idea pool. The observed human--LLM gap may therefore be partly, or even largely, a consequence of survivorship bias.
Organizations
Organizations 0
No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.
Models
Models introduced or described 0
Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.
No model links this paper yet
Datasets
Datasets used 0
No dataset relation recorded.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks used 0
No benchmark relation recorded.
Code
Repositories & frameworks 0
No repository linked.
Timeline
Timeline 1
- New paperPaperComment on arXiv:2607.01233: Survivorship Bias in Published-Paper Baselines for Research-Idea Distributions
New paper: Comment on arXiv:2607.01233: Survivorship Bias in Published-Paper Baselines for Research-Idea Distributions
arxiv
Sources
Sources 1
Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.