Skip to content
AI Atlas

Characterizing Web Search by Conversational LLM Agents: From Search Decisions and Strategies to Results and Responses

Published 18 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.19244

data quality89

Updated 4 h ago · first seen 18 Sept 2026

paper_01M2SEGZY6BZT1A468WQD5FFEX

Abstract

Conversational LLM agents increasingly rely on Web search, yet the end-to-end lifecycle of agentic search remains poorly understood. We present the first study of Web search across four major conversational platforms (ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, and DeepSeek), combining real-world user interactions (invivo) with controlled experiments using the same platform's models by their APIs (invitro). We investigate the quality of agentic decisions to invoke Web search, their strategies to formulate queries, the potential domain preferences in the search results they receive, and the choices they make when transforming search results into grounded responses. We find that Web-search decisions vary substantially across platforms and models, while more frequent Web-search invocation does not necessarily yield better response quality. We further show that conversational agents employ different complex querying strategies and that platform specific search engines return search results from their preferred domains. Finally, although responses are largely grounded in search results, some claims rely on uncited search results, raising concerns about attribution and reliability. Our findings have important implications for the design of future AI agents and Web search tools optimized for conversational retrieval.

Authors

Authors 12

Abhilasha RavichanderAbhisek DashAsmaa El FraihiElisabeth KirstenKrishna P. GummadiMahsa AmaniManish GuptaMuhammad Bilal ZafarQinyuan WuSeungeon LeeSoumi DasYunah Jang

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 0

No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 1

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 1

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.AI feedT1· Official4 h ago8

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.