Skip to content
AI Atlas
PaperActive

Chameleon: An Adaptive AI-Driven Honeypot Architecture Using Threat-Calibrated Particle Swarm Optimization and Semantic Deception Rapidly-Exploring Random Trees

arxiv.org/abs/2608.15407

Updated 52 min ago · first seen 11 Sept 2026

paper_01M294GQC5SFRAVHT5W2NCZZ5A

Published
11 Sept 2026
T1 · 52 min ago
arXiv
2608.15407
T1 · 52 min ago
Category
cs.CR
T1 · 52 min ago

Abstract

-cross Abstract: Traditional honeypots share an invariant behavioral profile: a skilled adversary can confirm the presence of a deception environment within a few diagnostic commands, limiting their intelligence value. Commercial deception products (USD 100,000-150,000/year) similarly lack real-time model-driven feedback. Chameleon, an openly distributed adaptive honeypot, addresses both shortcomings. It integrates: a BiLSTM classifier achieving 99.61% accuracy across seven threat categories at ~2 ms CPU latency; a locally deployed Qwen3.5-0.8B model delivering 90% generation accuracy at 4.5 ms latency; and two meta-heuristic engines. Threat-Calibrated PSO (TC-PSO) reshapes swarm inertia and objective amplification in proportion to the classifier's anomaly output, adjusting connection-holding delays in real time. Semantic Deception RRT (S-RRT) evolves deception schemas via exponentially scaled pheromone updates from a language-model severity assessment, with a depth-decay multiplier enforcing a finite memory footprint. A controlled 30-seed benchmark (42-71, identical trajectories and budgets) shows threat-calibrated inertia alone does not improve search over standard PSO on static or dynamic landscapes (p = 0.18); population-diversity mechanisms (GA/ACO) significantly outperform PSO-family optimizers on threat-regime shifts (p < 0.0001, d <= -37). S-RRT's depth-decay delivers a significant memory reduction versus standard RRT (53.1 vs. 119.2 units, p < 0.0001, d = -10.0); its severity-weighted pheromone does not improve raw fitness. Operating cost is ~USD 17/month, a ~490-fold reduction versus commercial alternatives.

Authors 4

Rohit Swami, Tushar Singh, Akash Warde, Sri Muthu

Specification

Official page

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 52 min agohigh

Arxiv announce type
replace

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 52 min agohigh

arXiv id
2608.15407

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 52 min agohigh

Categories
cs.CR, cs.AI, cs.NE

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 52 min agohigh

PDF

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 52 min agohigh

Primary category
cs.CR

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 52 min agohigh

Published
11 Sept 2026

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 52 min agohigh

Each value shows its source, tier and observation time. Conflicting claims are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. How AI Atlas records facts →

Provenance

Attributed facts

9

Source tiers

T19

Freshest observation

52 min ago

Conflicts

None