Skip to content
AI Atlas

Can Vision-Language Models Judge Olympic Diving? From Reasoning to Scores in Zero-Shot Action Quality Assessment

Published 18 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.19354

data quality89

Updated 4 h ago · first seen 18 Sept 2026

paper_01M2SEG2YYXKWMXGE9A9ZDGNHZ

Abstract

Automated action quality assessment (AQA) in Olympic sports remains a challenging task due to the complexity of human motion and the subjectivity inherent in expert judging. This work evaluates the capability of open-source Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to perform zero-shot action quality assessment on Olympic diving videos using the AQA-7 benchmark dataset. In this regard, a regression-based framework is pro-posed to leverage both the semantic reasoning and phase-level sub-scores generated by the VLMs, combining TF-IDF vectorization, dimensionality reduction, and ensemble learning to predict final competition scores. Experimental results show that standalone VLMs achieve moderate Spearman correlations below 0.32, while the proposed ensemble regression framework substantially improves performance in the reported evaluation, reaching a Spearman correlation of 0.67 with a four-model configuration. Textual reasoning features con-sistently outperformed raw numerical sub-scores, highlighting the richness of VLM-generated explanations for action quality analysis. These findings suggest that VLMs hold strong potential as assistive tools for explainable and semi-automated sports performance evaluation. The code is publicly available on GitHub https://github.com/hvelesaca/olympic diving judge vlm

Authors

Authors 4

Abel Reyes-AnguloDavid Freire-ObregonHenry O. VelesacaLuigi Miranda

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 0

No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 2

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 2

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.CV feedT1· Official4 h ago7
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.LG feedT1· Official4 h ago7

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.