Skip to content
AI Atlas

Beyond Safe Answers: Segment-Aware Listwise Alignment for Reasoning Safety in Large Reasoning Models

Published 15 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.15517

data quality89

Updated 29 h ago · first seen 15 Sept 2026

paper_01M2JK0TMAK70EGSKZ55ENN821

Abstract

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) pose a dual-surface safety challenge: both intermediate reasoning traces and final answers can contain harmful content. Existing alignment methods often operate at the whole-response level, allowing unsafe reasoning to be masked by a safe-looking final answer. We propose Segment-aware Listwise Target DPO (SaLT-DPO), which addresses this gap through three mechanisms: (1) segment-aware listwise alignment that decomposes responses into reasoning and answer segments, independently scores each segment's safety, and aligns length-normalized segment rewards with soft target distributions over multiple candidates; (2) joint safety coherence regularization that applies a weakest-link principle to promote safety consistency across both segments; and (3) utility anchoring on benign prompts to mitigate over-refusal and reasoning degradation. Experiments on three LRMs show that SaLT-DPO consistently reduces unsafe rates for both reasoning and answer segments while mitigating degradation in benign compliance and preserving general reasoning performance. Ablation studies demonstrate the complementary contributions of its components.

Authors

Authors 6

Byeonggeuk LimHayeong RyuHoejoon KwonJunehyoung KwonJungMin YunYoungBin Kim

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 0

No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 2

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 2

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.AI feedT1· Official21 h ago4
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.CL feedT1· Official21 h ago3

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.