Skip to content
AI Atlas
Papercs.LG

A Noise Optimum in Rehearsal-Free Continual Learning: Isolation, Mechanism, and Scope

Published 18 Sept 2026arXiv:2609.20162

data quality89

Updated 4 h ago · first seen 18 Sept 2026

paper_01M2SEG2T6E4MJWAH5R3MRNG3Y

Abstract

Injecting stochastic noise into a consolidation rule can improve a network's retention of earlier tasks up to an optimal level, then degrade it -- an inverted-U in retention vs. noise. This paper isolates what produces that optimum and maps where it holds, entirely in simulation. (1) Phenomenon: the retention inverted-U appears on several related-task continual-learning benchmarks (Split-MNIST, FashionMNIST, continual Yin-Yang). (2) Isolation: a magnitude-matched ladder shows the effect requires coherent restoring toward the consolidated weights -- a random-direction force of identical magnitude produces no optimum, and a coherent force toward the wrong target actively hurts. (3) Active ingredient: most of the optimum is recovered by coupling the anchor gain to the injected-noise variance sigma^2 -- a one-line rule that neither Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Adaptation (fixed gain) nor MESU (posterior-variance gain) implements. A forced Ornstein-Uhlenbeck calculation derives the rising flank and predicts that the optimal noise rises with per-task interference g -- confirmed out-of-sample in direction against pre-existing measurements (the exponent is unresolved at our grid). The barrier-conditioning of the originating Doob h-transform is a low-sigma safety net that bounds forgetting where the coupled gain is too weak. (4) Scope: the optimum requires shared task structure -- it is absent on permuted-MNIST, and a controlled rotated-vs-permuted comparison localizes the boundary to task structure; the precise governing quantity is left open. (5) Length: at matched severity the advantage persists but attenuates with task count, and we show no rotation family can attribute the trend (a compact-group identity). A single-seed BrainScaleS-2 demonstration of the originating rule is reported separately (Howe, arXiv:2607.06924); this paper makes no hardware claim.

Authors

Authors 1

Gunner Levi Howe

Linked names open researcher pages (created from the paper's author list; name-only, no affiliation unless a source states it). Unlinked names have no researcher record yet.

Organizations

Organizations 0

No organization stated. arXiv metadata does not carry affiliations; an organization is linked only when a model card or lab page cites the paper.

Models

Models introduced or described 0

Inbound described_by relations from model cards and documentation.

No model links this paper yet

Model pages link papers through their model cards and documentation; the relation is written only when a source states it.

Datasets

Datasets used 0

No dataset relation recorded.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks used 0

No benchmark relation recorded.

Code

Repositories & frameworks 0

No repository linked.

Timeline

Timeline 1

Full timeline →

Sources

Sources 1

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.LG feedT1· Official4 h ago7

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.