A Calibration Audit of Confidence in Feed-Forward 3D Reconstruction Models

Abstract

Feed-forward 3D reconstruction models output a per-pixel confidence that is used by downstream systems as an uncertainty signal. The confidence is trained to serve as a weight in the training loss of models. Whether the confidence can be used as an uncertainty magnitude has not been measured. We audit seven backbones on 13 datasets and score the confidence on four properties, i.e., ranking of error, ratio of error to uncertainty on average, slope of this ratio across the confidence range, and coverage of the implied error distribution. Although the confidence ranks error quite well, the uncertainty decoded from the confidence is too small compared to the actual error. The uncertainty has the right size only under the exact training conditions. The median case is off by at least 2.4x across all seven models, while the uncertainty is further off the more confident the model is. Our work shows that the overconfidence appears on unseen scenes even when the model reaches its loss's optimum. As a post-hoc repair we fit a power law on the confidence with two constants per backbone--dataset pair. The repair brings all four audited properties to target at the dataset level, while leaving ranking untouched. Fitted with the target dataset held out, the constants bring the median case from 2.4x off to 1.35x. The repair does not hold below the dataset level, where two-thirds of held-out scenes are still more than five points off in coverage. We attribute what the repair cannot reach to the model, which carries neither the scale of the error nor the shape of its distribution across predictions. We release the audit protocol, its results, and the fitted constants per backbone-dataset pair.

Authors 4

Nanxing Nick Deng, Qing Cheng, Niclas Zeller, Daniel Cremers

Specification

Official page

arxiv.org/abs/2608.29705

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)·T1·observed 2 h ago·high

Arxiv announce type

replace

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)·T1·observed 2 h ago·high

arXiv id

2608.29705

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)·T1·observed 2 h ago·high

Categories

cs.CV, cs.AI

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)·T1·observed 2 h ago·high

PDF

arxiv.org/pdf/2608.29705

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)·T1·observed 2 h ago·high

Primary category

cs.CV

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)·T1·observed 2 h ago·high

Published

11 Sept 2026

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)·T1·observed 2 h ago·high

Each value shows its source, tier and observation time. Conflicting claims are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. How AI Atlas records facts →

Provenance