(Whose defaults?) Is artificial intelligence reorienting archaeological methods?

Abstract

Generative AI and the practice of "vibe coding" are changing how archaeologists carry out computational research, but their effects on the discipline's range of methods is still understudied. In this paper, we evaluate whether large language models (LLMs) are narrowing the variety of methods archaeologists use. We first analysed approximately 119,000 archaeology abstracts from Scopus, covering publications from 2010 to 2025. Using a locally run LLM, we identified the computational methods reported in each abstract and organised them into 25 broad categories (L2) and 241 finer clusters (L3). A Bayesian Dirichlet-multinomial model of method composition within sub-disciplines found a small but credible shift in method use after 2023. However, this shift was smaller than the variation already present across the full study period. No individual technique showed a significant change, and overall methodological diversity increased rather than declined. We then ran a controlled experiment to see whether LLMs recommend a narrower set of methods than archaeologists have used in practice. Two different open-weight models were asked to suggest methods for 28 archaeological research problems, with prompts providing three levels of methodological guidance: novice, intermediate, and expert. Recommendation diversity was much lower than in the published literature, particularly without methodological guidance. The models also tended to favour methods that were widely used before 2023, and their recommendations more closely resembled the post-2023 literature. Taken together, these results are consistent with LLMs pushing methodological choice towards convergence, although our study cannot establish a causal effect. They raise a broader question: how can archaeology retain methodological diversity as LLMs become more involved in research?

Authors 2

Lorenzo Cardarelli, Roberto Ragno

Specification

Official page

arxiv.org/abs/2609.11198

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)·T1·observed 6 h ago·high

Arxiv announce type

cross

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)·T1·observed 6 h ago·high

arXiv id

2609.11198

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)·T1·observed 6 h ago·high

Categories

cs.CY, cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.HC

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)·T1·observed 6 h ago·high

PDF

arxiv.org/pdf/2609.11198

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)·T1·observed 6 h ago·high

Primary category

cs.CY

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)·T1·observed 6 h ago·high

Published

11 Sept 2026

Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)·T1·observed 6 h ago·high

Each value shows its source, tier and observation time. Conflicting claims are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. How AI Atlas records facts →

Provenance