When does a spectral prior help graph learning? Connectivity-loss estimation under road-network disruptions
Updated 34 min ago · first seen 11 Sept 2026
paper_01M294FP2AT18XG9905VD6C0F5
- Published
- 11 Sept 2026
- T1 · 34 min ago
- arXiv
- 2609.11166
- T1 · 34 min ago
- Category
- cs.LG
- T1 · 34 min ago
Abstract
Rapid evaluation of many simultaneous road-link disruptions requires a practical compromise between exact spectral recomputation and local approximation. We estimate relative algebraic-connectivity loss after multi-edge deletion using graph neural networks (GNNs) that learn a bounded correction to a first-order Fiedler sensitivity. The study considers independent, spatially clustered, and edge-betweenness-targeted failures, with graph-disjoint synthetic splits and zero-shot transfer to 13 OpenStreetMap (OSM) areas in six countries. GCN, GraphSAGE, and edge-aware MPNN backbones are compared with analytical baselines. In expanded OSM tests, residual GCN improves spatial-failure MAE by 0.0391 (95% hierarchical interval 0.0151-0.0662), while residual GraphSAGE improves targeted-failure MAE by 0.0257 (0.0095-0.0446). Second-order perturbation improves first-order MAE by only 0.0028-0.0053. Correction slopes decrease under targeted transfer, indicating residual shrinkage around systematic prior error. Leave-one-country-out OSM-to-OSM transfer is mixed: residual GCN improves targeted-failure MAE by 0.0622 (0.0169-0.1153) but worsens the spatial point estimate. Sparse scaling extends to 20,000 nodes and separates one-time spectral setup from amortized screening cost. These results characterize the spectral residual as a useful but domain-sensitive inductive bias for structural connectivity screening. Code, cached networks, and reproducibility artifacts are archived at doi:10.5281/zenodo.22307723.
Authors 1
Van-Truong Le
Specification
- Official page
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 34 min agohigh
- Arxiv announce type
- new
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 34 min agohigh
- arXiv id
- 2609.11166
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 34 min agohigh
- Categories
- cs.LG
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 34 min agohigh
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 34 min agohigh
- Primary category
- cs.LG
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 34 min agohigh
- Published
- 11 Sept 2026
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 34 min agohigh
Each value shows its source, tier and observation time. Conflicting claims are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. How AI Atlas records facts →
Provenance
Attributed facts
9
Source tiers
T19
Freshest observation
34 min ago
Conflicts
None
No models linked to this paper yet.
- Authors
- Van-Truong Le
As of
Rewind the record: see this entity's attributes exactly as AI Atlas knew them on a given day.
Claim history · Published
Publishedpublished_at1
| Value | Valid from → to | Status | Source | Confidence | Extractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026 | → current | current | arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1 | high | deterministic |
Claims are temporal and append-only: a new observation closes the previous claim (valid_to) instead of overwriting it. Conflicting claims from different sources are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. Methodology →
- New paperPaperWhen does a spectral prior help graph learning? Connectivity-loss estimation under road-network disruptions
New paper: When does a spectral prior help graph learning? Connectivity-loss estimation under road-network disruptions
arxiv
| Source | Document | Type | Tier | Last observed | Snapshots |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| arXiv (Atom API + RSS) | rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.LG | feed | T1· Official | 34 min ago | 1 |
Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.