Shifting Relational Paradigms for Affective Computing: Affective Resonance, Vitality Affects, and Vocal Interaction Fields — Paper

Abstract

Affective computing has largely followed an individual-state paradigm, extracting discrete emotion labels or arousal/valence from isolated speakers. We argue this framing is incomplete for interaction. Drawing on affective resonance and vitality-contour accounts, we propose a relational framework in which the primary unit of affective analysis is the interactional field constituted within vocal dynamics. As a proof of concept, we present a preliminary empirical study using continuous self-supervised speech representations to detect directional expressive coupling in multi-party conversation. Coupling is regime-specific, concentrated at sub-second timescales, and collapses under exclusive-speech negative controls, consistent with a relational account of affective dynamics. We introduce design frameworks for Artificial Affective Resonance Intelligence grounded in Affective Resonance Dynamic Ontologies, supported by null-calibrated directional coupling analyses across interaction regimes.

Authors 2

Cy Gorman, Yihang Yao

Specification

Official page: arxiv.org/abs/2609.09864
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 6 h agohigh
Arxiv announce type: new
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 6 h agohigh
arXiv id: 2609.09864
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 6 h agohigh
Categories: cs.AI
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 6 h agohigh
PDF: arxiv.org/pdf/2609.09864
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 6 h agohigh
Primary category: cs.AI
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 6 h agohigh
Published: 11 Sept 2026
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 6 h agohigh

Each value shows its source, tier and observation time. Conflicting claims are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. How AI Atlas records facts →

Provenance

Attributed facts

9

Source tiers

T19

Freshest observation

6 h ago

Conflicts

None

No models linked to this paper yet.

Authors: Cy Gorman, Yihang Yao

As of

Rewind the record: see this entity's attributes exactly as AI Atlas knew them on a given day.

Claim history · Abstract

1 claims · 1 propertiesShow all properties

Abstractabstract1

Claim history for Abstract
Value	Valid from → to	Status	Source	Confidence	Extractor
Affective computing has largely followed an individual-state paradigm, extracting discrete emotion labels or arousal/valence from isolated speakers. We argue this framing is incomplete for interaction. Drawing on affective resonance and vitality-contour accounts, we propose a relational framework in which the primary unit of affective analysis is the interactional field constituted within vocal dynamics. As a proof of concept, we present a preliminary empirical study using continuous self-supervised speech representations to detect directional expressive coupling in multi-party conversation. Coupling is regime-specific, concentrated at sub-second timescales, and collapses under exclusive-speech negative controls, consistent with a relational account of affective dynamics. We introduce design frameworks for Artificial Affective Resonance Intelligence grounded in Affective Resonance Dynamic Ontologies, supported by null-calibrated directional coupling analyses across interaction regimes.	11 Sept 2026 21:03 UTC → current	current	arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1	high	deterministic

Claims are temporal and append-only: a new observation closes the previous claim (valid_to) instead of overwriting it. Conflicting claims from different sources are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. Methodology →

11 Sept 2026
New paperPaperShifting Relational Paradigms for Affective Computing: Affective Resonance, Vitality Affects, and Vocal Interaction Fields
New paper: Shifting Relational Paradigms for Affective Computing: Affective Resonance, Vitality Affects, and Vocal Interaction Fields
arxiv
rss.arxiv.org

Full timeline →

Source documents
Source	Document	Type	Tier	Last observed	Snapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)	rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.AI	feed	T1· Official	5 h ago	1

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.