Skip to content
AI Atlas
PaperActive

Near-Optimal Reinforcement Learning with Multi-Step Transition Lookahead

arxiv.org/abs/2609.11807

quality89

Updated 7 h ago · first seen 11 Sept 2026

paper_01M294FRGFNJGG0B72ZQ5CK0JQ

Published
11 Sept 2026
T1 · 7 h ago
arXiv
2609.11807
T1 · 7 h ago
Category
stat.ML
T1 · 7 h ago

As of

Rewind the record: see this entity's attributes exactly as AI Atlas knew them on a given day.

Claim history

9 claims · 9 properties

Official pageofficial_url1

Claim history for Official page
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11807currentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

Abstractabstract1

Claim history for Abstract
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
We study reinforcement learning (RL) with transition look-ahead, where the agent may observe which states would be visited upon playing any sequence of $\ell$ actions before deciding its course of action. Although look-ahead can substantially improve achievable performance, it is known that optimal planning with multi-step transition look-ahead is NP-hard, but this hardness was established using discount factors arbitrarily close to one. It was therefore unknown whether the problem remains hard for any discount factor, and whether near-optimal planning can nevertheless be performed efficiently. We resolve both questions. First, we show that for every fixed rational discount factor ($\gamma\in(0,1)$), exact planning remains NP-hard. Second, we introduce a randomized polynomial-time approximation scheme for every fixed look-ahead depth. We then extend our approach to unknown transitions and stochastic rewards using optimism and variance-adaptive confidence bounds. The resulting algorithm achieves cumulative regret whose leading term matches classical tabular discounted RL up to logarithmic factors. Thus, although exact planning with transition look-ahead is NP-hard, efficient near-optimal planning and learning remain possible.currentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

Arxiv announce typearxiv_announce_type1

Claim history for Arxiv announce type
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
crosscurrentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

arXiv idarxiv_id1

Claim history for arXiv id
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
2609.11807currentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

Authorsauthors1

Claim history for Authors
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
Corentin Pla, Hugo Richard, Marc Abeille, Vianney PerchetcurrentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

Categoriescategories1

Claim history for Categories
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
stat.ML, cs.LGcurrentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

PDFpdf_url1

Claim history for PDF
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.11807currentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

Primary categoryprimary_category1

Claim history for Primary category
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
stat.MLcurrentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

Publishedpublished_at1

Claim history for Published
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
11 Sept 2026currentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

Claims are temporal and append-only: a new observation closes the previous claim (valid_to) instead of overwriting it. Conflicting claims from different sources are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. Methodology →