Narrative Consolidation: Formulating a New Task for Unifying Multi-Perspective Accounts
Updated 2 h ago · first seen 11 Sept 2026
paper_01M294FSZ9YMC2MD09W0W6PE6B
- Published
- 11 Sept 2026
- T1 · 2 h ago
- arXiv
- 2512.18041
- T1 · 2 h ago
- Category
- cs.CL
- T1 · 2 h ago
Abstract
-cross Abstract: Processing overlapping narrative documents, such as legal testimonies or historical accounts, often aims not for compression but for a unified, coherent, and chronologically sound text. Standard Multi-Document Summarization (MDS), with its focus on conciseness, fails to preserve narrative flow. This paper formally defines this challenge as a new NLP task, Narrative Consolidation, focusing on chronological integrity, completeness, and the fusion of complementary details. We establish the resources needed to study it: a formal task definition, an evaluation paradigm, the Gospel Consolidation Language Resource -- a benchmark built from the four Biblical Gospels with 169 canonical events, cross-document alignments, and a reference consolidation -- and a suite of reference systems, ranging from timeline-agnostic heuristics to the Temporal Alignment Event Graph (TAEG). Benchmarking yields three findings. First, the explicit temporal backbone is the dominant factor: every system granted the canonical timeline raises ROUGE-L F1 from 0.206 to at least 0.81. Second, on a fusion-style reference, a simple length heuristic is remarkably strong (0.947 ROUGE-L F1), outperforming graph-based selection (0.846). Third, ablations show the discriminative signal resides in temporal edges, while intra-cluster lexical similarity is uninformative. These results establish Narrative Consolidation as a distinct task and pose an open challenge: to surpass that heuristic with a principled selection mechanism and true fusion of complementary details.
Authors 4
Roger A. Finger, Eduardo G. Cortes, Sandro J. Rigo, Gabriel de O. Ramos
Specification
- Official page
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
- Arxiv announce type
- replace
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
- arXiv id
- 2512.18041
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
- Categories
- cs.CL, cs.LG
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
- DOI
- 10.5753/jbcs.2026.7717
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
- Primary category
- cs.CL
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
- Published
- 11 Sept 2026
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
Each value shows its source, tier and observation time. Conflicting claims are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. How AI Atlas records facts →
Provenance
Attributed facts
10
Source tiers
T110
Freshest observation
2 h ago
Conflicts
None
No models linked to this paper yet.
As of
Rewind the record: see this entity's attributes exactly as AI Atlas knew them on a given day.
Claim history · Abstract
Abstractabstract1
| Value | Valid from → to | Status | Source | Confidence | Extractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -cross Abstract: Processing overlapping narrative documents, such as legal testimonies or historical accounts, often aims not for compression but for a unified, coherent, and chronologically sound text. Standard Multi-Document Summarization (MDS), with its focus on conciseness, fails to preserve narrative flow. This paper formally defines this challenge as a new NLP task, Narrative Consolidation, focusing on chronological integrity, completeness, and the fusion of complementary details. We establish the resources needed to study it: a formal task definition, an evaluation paradigm, the Gospel Consolidation Language Resource -- a benchmark built from the four Biblical Gospels with 169 canonical events, cross-document alignments, and a reference consolidation -- and a suite of reference systems, ranging from timeline-agnostic heuristics to the Temporal Alignment Event Graph (TAEG). Benchmarking yields three findings. First, the explicit temporal backbone is the dominant factor: every system granted the canonical timeline raises ROUGE-L F1 from 0.206 to at least 0.81. Second, on a fusion-style reference, a simple length heuristic is remarkably strong (0.947 ROUGE-L F1), outperforming graph-based selection (0.846). Third, ablations show the discriminative signal resides in temporal edges, while intra-cluster lexical similarity is uninformative. These results establish Narrative Consolidation as a distinct task and pose an open challenge: to surpass that heuristic with a principled selection mechanism and true fusion of complementary details. | → current | current | arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1 | high | deterministic |
Claims are temporal and append-only: a new observation closes the previous claim (valid_to) instead of overwriting it. Conflicting claims from different sources are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. Methodology →
- New paperPaperNarrative Consolidation: Formulating a New Task for Unifying Multi-Perspective Accounts
New paper: Narrative Consolidation: Formulating a New Task for Unifying Multi-Perspective Accounts
arxiv
| Source | Document | Type | Tier | Last observed | Snapshots |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| arXiv (Atom API + RSS) | rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.LG | feed | T1· Official | 40 min ago | 1 |
Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.