Skip to content
AI Atlas
PaperActive

LILA: Calibration-Free Structured Pruning of Large Language Models via Latent Spectral Geometry

arxiv.org/abs/2609.11163

Updated 1 h ago · first seen 11 Sept 2026

paper_01M294FP1VVTCW15ZGNK0HCF54

Published
11 Sept 2026
T1 · 1 h ago
arXiv
2609.11163
T1 · 1 h ago
Category
cs.LG
T1 · 1 h ago

As of

Rewind the record: see this entity's attributes exactly as AI Atlas knew them on a given day.

Claim history

10 claims · 9 properties

Official pageofficial_url1

Claim history for Official page
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11163currentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

Abstractabstract1

Claim history for Abstract
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
Structured pruning of large language models (LLMs) offers hardware-efficient compression, yet existing methods require calibration data, gradient computation, or large auxiliary policy networks at pruning time. LILA (\emph{Latent-Informed Layer Analysis}) scores neuron importance via the Kolmogorov--Smirnov (KS) distance between empirical singular value distributions of the full and neuron-ablated feed-forward network (FFN) weight matrix, providing a closed-form spectral rule requiring no training, calibration data, or auxiliary network. Without any fine-tuning, LILA surpasses PruneNet (45M-parameter RL policy) by 1.57~pp in zero-shot accuracy on LLaMA-2-7B at 25\% sparsity, and outperforms WikiText-2-calibrated SliceGPT by up to 6.0~pp across all sparsity levels, while preserving the original architecture. After one epoch of LoRA recovery fine-tuning, LILA achieves highly competitive performance, matching the heavily calibrated SliceGPT baseline to within a 0.48~pp margin across LLaMA-2-7B and Phi-2, despite using zero calibration data. A Neural Tangent Kernel analysis confirms a 22$\times$ reduction in functional distortion versus random pruning, providing theoretical grounding for the spectral importance criterion. Finally, extending LILA to dynamically allocate sparsity budgets via KS-scores yields state-of-the-art generative preservation at moderate compression, while uncovering fundamental single-layer architectural bottlenecks at higher compression regimes.currentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

Arxiv announce typearxiv_announce_type2

Claim history for Arxiv announce type
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
crosscurrentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic
newsupersededarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

arXiv idarxiv_id1

Claim history for arXiv id
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
2609.11163currentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

Authorsauthors1

Claim history for Authors
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
Sankar Behera, Dhruv Singh, Anshika Agnihotri, Raj Kumar Choudhary, Satyadev Ahlawat, Yamuna PrasadcurrentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

Categoriescategories1

Claim history for Categories
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
cs.LG, cs.CLcurrentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

PDFpdf_url1

Claim history for PDF
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.11163currentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

Primary categoryprimary_category1

Claim history for Primary category
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
cs.LGcurrentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

Publishedpublished_at1

Claim history for Published
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
11 Sept 2026currentcurrentarXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1highdeterministic

Claims are temporal and append-only: a new observation closes the previous claim (valid_to) instead of overwriting it. Conflicting claims from different sources are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. Methodology →