Generating a Consistent Enterprise: Synthesis and Reference-Free Evaluation of Multi-System Business Data — Paper

Abstract

Synthetic relational data is normally produced by a model trained on a real dataset, and its quality is measured as the distance to that dataset. This paper describes a generator that has no real dataset at either end. Given an industry, a company size, a business model, a set of business applications, and a random seed, it produces a complete fictional enterprise: a workforce, a customer base, sales deals, support tickets, recorded calls, chat messages, and documents, all consistent with one another. One entity graph is projected into the native formats of 66 business products, so the same customer appears in the CRM, the support desk, and the call system under one identity. Because no real counterpart exists, realism is built in from cited reference statistics and verified by reference-free measurement: a five-axis scorecard of 28 statistical checks, an adversarial detector that hunts for the marks of synthetic generation, and a set of soundness checks that include a classifier test against an independently shuffled copy of the data. Because these instruments existed before the generator was tuned, progress is measured under a fixed yardstick: over 23 generated companies, mean realism climbed from 60.3 to 99.1, the weakest company from 41.1 to 94.9, and the detector, which initially flagged 55.2% of all records, now flags none. The scores hold on a seed never used during development. A second generator builds relational databases from a list of business questions. It forces qualifying rows for each answerable question, adds controlled near misses, and computes exact labels from the finished tables. The generator runs as a hosted service at https://console.era.eon.io. A company built there to a specification is served through its simulators over MCP and REST, and the simulators are also published as container images for offline use

Authors 7

Assaf Natanzon, Benjamin Gruenbaum, Chen Dinachi, Doron Porat, Omer Niv, Or Itzahary, Roy Zavida

Specification

Official page: arxiv.org/abs/2609.11286
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
Arxiv announce type: new
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
arXiv id: 2609.11286
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
Categories: cs.AI
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
PDF: arxiv.org/pdf/2609.11286
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
Primary category: cs.AI
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
Published: 12 Sept 2026
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh

Each value shows its source, tier and observation time. Conflicting claims are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. How AI Atlas records facts →

Provenance

Attributed facts

9

Source tiers

T19

Freshest observation

2 h ago

Conflicts

None

No models linked to this paper yet.

Authors: Benjamin Gruenbaum, Doron Porat, Assaf Natanzon

As of

Rewind the record: see this entity's attributes exactly as AI Atlas knew them on a given day.

Claim history · Arxiv announce type

1 claims · 1 propertiesShow all properties

Arxiv announce typearxiv_announce_type1

Claim history for Arxiv announce type
Value	Valid from → to	Status	Source	Confidence	Extractor
new	12 Sept 2026 04:12 UTC → current	current	arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1	high	deterministic

Claims are temporal and append-only: a new observation closes the previous claim (valid_to) instead of overwriting it. Conflicting claims from different sources are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. Methodology →

12 Sept 2026
New paperPaperGenerating a Consistent Enterprise: Synthesis and Reference-Free Evaluation of Multi-System Business Data
New paper: Generating a Consistent Enterprise: Synthesis and Reference-Free Evaluation of Multi-System Business Data
arxiv
rss.arxiv.org

Full timeline →

Source documents
Source	Document	Type	Tier	Last observed	Snapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)	rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.AI	feed	T1· Official	2 h ago	2

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.