PaperActive

Differentially Private EEG Feature Anonymization: A Privacy-Utility Case Study in Clinical Neurophysiology

quality89

Updated 2 h ago · first seen 11 Sept 2026

paper_01M294FRF0FTFEPGFQ4CP64WX0

Published: 11 Sept 2026; T1 · 2 h ago
arXiv: 2609.11777; T1 · 2 h ago
Category: cs.CR; T1 · 2 h ago

Abstract

Clinical electroencephalography (EEG) data are valuable for healthcare research and for developing artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision-support systems, but EEG recordings and derived features may contain sensitive patient-specific information. This creates privacy risks when data are reused, analyzed, or shared across clinical and research environments. Conventional anonymization methods are often insufficient for high-dimensional biomedical signals, since removing direct identifiers does not necessarily prevent re-identification, linkage, or inference risks. At the same time, strong privacy protection may distort clinically relevant signal characteristics and reduce data utility. This paper studies subject-level differential privacy for protecting clinical EEG-derived feature representations using Gaussian and Laplace perturbations. The proposed framework considers three deployment scenarios: client-side anonymization, centralized server-side anonymization, and decentralized local training. Following EEG preprocessing and feature extraction, Gaussian and Laplace perturbations are applied to the resulting patient-level EEG feature representations. The Laplace experiments evaluate the implemented noise scales, while the scales required for formal full-vector calibration are derived separately. The effects of both perturbations are assessed using statistical utility measures and a downstream machine-learning-based utility check. The results show that differentially private perturbation can be integrated into EEG processing workflows, but the selected mechanism, privacy parameters, and sensitivity calibration strongly influence data utility. The study highlights the practical privacy-utility trade-off in DP-based EEG feature anonymization and the challenges of preserving downstream utility in small and imbalanced clinical EEG datasets.

Authors 2

Noman Sadiq, Mohsen Toorani

Specification

Official page: arxiv.org/abs/2609.11777
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
Arxiv announce type: cross
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
arXiv id: 2609.11777
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
Categories: cs.CR, cs.LG, eess.SP
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
PDF: arxiv.org/pdf/2609.11777
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
Primary category: cs.CR
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh
Published: 11 Sept 2026
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 2 h agohigh

Each value shows its source, tier and observation time. Conflicting claims are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. How AI Atlas records facts →

Provenance

Attributed facts

Source tiers

T19

Freshest observation

2 h ago

Conflicts

None

As of

Rewind the record: see this entity's attributes exactly as AI Atlas knew them on a given day.

Claim history · PDF

1 claims · 1 propertiesShow all properties

PDFpdf_url1

Claim history for PDF
Value	Valid from → to	Status	Source	Confidence	Extractor
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.11777	11 Sept 2026 21:02 UTC → current	current	arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1	high	deterministic

Claims are temporal and append-only: a new observation closes the previous claim (valid_to) instead of overwriting it. Conflicting claims from different sources are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. Methodology →

Source documents
Source	Document	Type	Tier	Last observed	Snapshots
arXiv (Atom API + RSS)	rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.LG	feed	T1· Official	14 min ago	1

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.