Updated 50 min ago · first seen 11 Sept 2026
paper_01M294FQMZ0EWCFGZNWFKA4CDT
- Published
- 11 Sept 2026
- T1 · 50 min ago
- arXiv
- 2609.11149
- T1 · 50 min ago
- Category
- cs.CL
- T1 · 50 min ago
Abstract
Model-generated text is finding its way back into training corpora, and there is plenty of evidence that training on such data over and over collapses output diversity. Prior work has studied the phenomenon itself: which protocols and which data mixtures cause collapse. But different models behave very differently under the same process. We fix one recursive contamination protocol and let 13 publicly released checkpoints form an ecosystem that shares a common corpus for five generations. The unique 4-gram outcome after five generations ranges from 0.187 to 0.940 across checkpoints, a roughly five-fold spread: some models are barely touched, others degenerate into repetitive fragments. Changing the composition of the shared pool or mixing in human text keeps the Spearman correlation of the ordering at 0.91--0.97, and changing the random seed keeps it at 0.93--0.98. Whether a model collapses easily under recursive training is, then, a property of the checkpoint itself, and one that has gone largely unexamined. Parameter scale alone does not explain it, since a three-size ladder within one family is not monotonic in size, and none of the static indicators we tested predicts it either. What does work is cheap: let a model iterate on its own output for two or three generations, and its fragility in the larger ecosystem can be inferred from that alone. Collapse speed also responds to intervention. Tightening top-p, which cuts the low-probability tail at generation time, nearly stops collapse within three generations and stabilizes six checkpoints spanning the whole spectrum together, while data-side filtering slows collapse without stopping it.
Authors 2
Yangze Liu, Zhongyi Han
Specification
- Official page
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 50 min agohigh
- Arxiv announce type
- new
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 50 min agohigh
- arXiv id
- 2609.11149
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 50 min agohigh
- Categories
- cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 50 min agohigh
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 50 min agohigh
- Primary category
- cs.CL
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 50 min agohigh
- Published
- 11 Sept 2026
Source:arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1observed 50 min agohigh
Each value shows its source, tier and observation time. Conflicting claims are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. How AI Atlas records facts →
Provenance
Attributed facts
9
Source tiers
T19
Freshest observation
50 min ago
Conflicts
None
No models linked to this paper yet.
- Authors
- Yangze Liu, Zhongyi Han
As of
Rewind the record: see this entity's attributes exactly as AI Atlas knew them on a given day.
Claim history · Official page
Official pageofficial_url1
| Value | Valid from → to | Status | Source | Confidence | Extractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11149 | → current | current | arXiv (Atom API + RSS)T1 | high | deterministic |
Claims are temporal and append-only: a new observation closes the previous claim (valid_to) instead of overwriting it. Conflicting claims from different sources are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. Methodology →
A Fragility Spectrum for Recursive Language-Model Training: arxiv announce type changed from cross to new
Arxiv announce typecross→newarxivNew paper: A Fragility Spectrum for Recursive Language-Model Training
arxiv
| Source | Document | Type | Tier | Last observed | Snapshots |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| arXiv (Atom API + RSS) | rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.CL | feed | T1· Official | 50 min ago | 1 |
| arXiv (Atom API + RSS) | rss.arxiv.org/rss/cs.LG | feed | T1· Official | 50 min ago | 1 |
Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.