Skip to content
AI Atlas
ModelActiveOpen weightsIdentity probable

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee AI

Trinity Large Thinking is a powerful open source reasoning model from the team at Arcee AI. It shows strong performance in PinchBench, agentic workloads, and reasoning tasks. Launch video: https://youtu.be/Gc82AXLa0Rg?si=4RLn6WBz33qT--B7...

Open in Graph
data quality60

Updated 3 h ago · first seen 11 Sept 2026

model_01M294WW1ZCDWSJ9NK046VTKWS

Overview

Identity

Canonical model
Yesidentity confidence: mediumOne row per real model release. Artifacts (checkpoints, quantisations, conversions) and folded evaluation variants point here.
Official checkpoints
official_checkpoints = hf_repo identifiers carried by the model itself; artifacts are separate entities pointing here through canonical_id.
Artifacts
None recordedSeparate entities (checkpoint · quantization · conversion · packaging) pointing to this model through canonical_id.
Provider deployments
1
API aliases
arcee-ai/trinity-large-thinkingtrinity-large-thinkingIdentifiers under which providers and evaluators refer to this model.
Folded evaluation variants
0Effort / thinking variants (…-high, …-non-reasoning) are result configurations of this model, not separate models. Their old URLs redirect here.

Openness

Open weightsweights downloadable; 7 dimensions unknown.

Weights downloadable under a permissive or Creative Commons licence allowing commercial use; code or data may be missing.

  • Weights

    Yes

  • Inference code

  • Training code

  • Training data

  • Dataset

  • Commercial use

  • Redistribution

  • Derivatives

dimensions marked null are unknown, not false

Key facts

Release date

Source:OpenRouter public model & pricing listingT2observed 13 h agomedium

Openrouter id

Source:OpenRouter public model & pricing listingT2observed 13 h agomedium

Architecture

Hugging Face repo

Source:OpenRouter public model & pricing listingT2observed 13 h agomedium

Capabilities

Modalities

Modalities
text
Input
text
Output
text

Capabilities

  • Tool calling

    Yes

    OpenRouter public model & pricing listing · T2

  • Structured output

    No

    OpenRouter public model & pricing listing · T2

  • Reasoning

    Yes

    OpenRouter public model & pricing listing · T2

  • Vision

    Unavailable

  • Audio

    Unavailable

  • Fine-tuning available

    Unavailable

Context window

Source:OpenRouter public model & pricing listingT2observed 10 h agomedium

Max output

Source:OpenRouter public model & pricing listingT2observed 13 h agomedium

Comparable same task and conditions · Partially comparable same task, conditions differ (effort, temperature, judge) · Not comparable different variant or metric

Benchmark results grouped by comparability group
Benchmark · groupBest scoreTrustConfigurationResultsvs leaderEvaluatedSource
Terminal-Benchagentic · accuracy · variant=hard · evaluator=Artificial AnalysisIndependentevaluatorArtificial Analysisvarianthardreasoningonconditions differ across rows → partially comparable2−43.2 ptvs gpt-5.6-solobs. 12 Sept 2026artificialanalysis.aiT2
Terminal-Benchagentic · accuracy · variant=v4.0 · evaluator=Artificial AnalysisIndependentevaluatorArtificial Analysisvariantv4.0reasoningonconditions differ across rows → partially comparable2non-primary groupobs. 12 Sept 2026artificialanalysis.aiT2
Terminal-Benchagentic · accuracy · variant=v2.1 · evaluator=Artificial AnalysisIndependentevaluatorArtificial Analysisvariantv2.1reasoningonconditions differ across rows → partially comparable2non-primary groupobs. 12 Sept 2026artificialanalysis.aiT2
τ²-benchagentic · pass^1 · variant=Telecom · evaluator=Artificial AnalysisIndependentevaluatorArtificial AnalysisvariantTelecomreasoningonconditions differ across rows → partially comparable1non-primary groupobs. 12 Sept 2026artificialanalysis.aiT2
τ²-benchagentic · pass^1 · evaluator=Artificial AnalysisIndependentevaluatorArtificial Analysis1−9.06 ptvs Z.ai GLM 5.2obs. 11 Sept 2026artificialanalysis.aiT2
SciCodecoding · accuracy · evaluator=Artificial AnalysisIndependentevaluatorArtificial Analysisreasoningonconditions differ across rows → partially comparable2−22.5 ptvs Claude Fable 5.1obs. 12 Sept 2026artificialanalysis.aiT2
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexcomposite · indexIndependentreasoningonversion4.3conditions differ across rows → partially comparable2−42.5vs Claude Fable 5.1obs. 12 Sept 2026artificialanalysis.aiT2
IFBenchinstruction-following · accuracy · evaluator=Artificial AnalysisIndependentevaluatorArtificial Analysisreasoningonconditions differ across rows → partially comparable2−27.1 ptvs Grok 4.3obs. 12 Sept 2026artificialanalysis.aiT2
Humanity's Last Examknowledge · accuracy · evaluator=Artificial AnalysisIndependentevaluatorArtificial Analysisreasoningonconditions differ across rows → partially comparable2−43.3 ptvs Claude Fable 5.1obs. 12 Sept 2026artificialanalysis.aiT2
GPQA Diamondreasoning · accuracy · variant=Diamond · evaluator=Artificial AnalysisIndependentevaluatorArtificial AnalysisvariantDiamondreasoningonconditions differ across rows → partially comparable1non-primary groupobs. 12 Sept 2026artificialanalysis.aiT2
GPQA Diamondreasoning · accuracy · variant=GPQA Diamond · evaluator=Artificial AnalysisIndependentevaluatorArtificial AnalysisvariantGPQA Diamond1−21.1 ptvs gpt-6-astraobs. 11 Sept 2026artificialanalysis.aiT2

Current rows only, grouped by benchmark → canonical metric → comparability group (task configuration). Effort variants folded into this model appear as rows of the same group. 18 current rows in total. “vs leader” compares with the current leader of the benchmark's primary group only; other groups are not directly comparable. Comparability rules →

Provider deployments, cheapest output first
ProviderContextInput / 1MCached inOutput / 1MStatusObservedSource
OpenRoutercheapest outputarcee-ai/trinity-large-thinking262.1Kout 80K$0.06active1 h agosince 11 Sept 2026openrouter.aiT2

USD per 1M tokens as published by each provider; native units (per-request fees, flex/priority tiers) are kept verbatim. Rows are append-only — every price change is kept in the history below. Cost of a workload →

Price history

Step lines per provider; amber markers are recorded changes. Click a marker or a row for the evidence behind that price.

Output price · USD / 1M tokens 1 provider

Output price history of Trinity Large Thinking$0$0.20$0.40$0.60$0.80$1Sept 26Sept 26Sept 26Sept 26OpenRouter: first observed → $0.80 · 11 Sept 2026
  • OpenRouter
  • OpenRouterfirst observed $0.8011 Sept 2026

Input price · USD / 1M tokens 1 provider

Input price history of Trinity Large Thinking$0$0.10$0.20$0.30Sept 26Sept 26Sept 26Sept 26OpenRouter: first observed → $0.25 · 11 Sept 2026
  • OpenRouter
  • OpenRouterfirst observed $0.2511 Sept 2026

Versions & Artifacts0

Version history

Context window2 changes

11 Sept 202611 Sept 202612 Sept 2026current

Max outputfirst observation only

11 Sept 2026current

Opennessfirst observation only

11 Sept 2026current

Each hop is a claim: click a value for its source, tier and observation time. Nothing is overwritten — a new observation closes the previous claim.

Artifacts 0

No artifact (checkpoint, quantisation, conversion or packaging) points to this model yet.

Change history

Temporal, append-only claims: a new observation closes the previous claim instead of overwriting it. Rewind the record with the as-of picker.
1 claims · 1 propertiesShow all properties

Opennessopenness1

Claim history for Openness
ValueValid from → toStatusSourceConfidenceExtractor
open-weightscurrentcurrentArtificial AnalysisT2mediumdeterministic

Claims are temporal and append-only: a new observation closes the previous claim (valid_to) instead of overwriting it. Conflicting claims from different sources are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. Methodology →

Provenance

Attributed facts

19

Source tiers

T219

Freshest observation

3 h ago

Conflicts

None

Source documents 2

Source documents
SourceDocumentTypeTierLast observedSnapshots
OpenRouter public model & pricing listingopenrouter.ai/api/v1/models catalogueT2· Quality secondary1 h ago9
Artificial Analysisartificialanalysis.ai/leaderboards/models leaderboardT2· Quality secondary3 h ago2

Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.

Data quality (60/100) measures how well AI Atlas knows this entity — completeness, primary-source ratio, freshness, conflicts — never how good the model is. Methodology →