Ling 3.0 Flash
*Ling-3.0-flash* is a *124B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model*, with approximately *5.1B parameters activated per token*. The model is designed with *token efficiency and production-scale agentic inference* as key priorities, enabling developers...
Updated 5 h ago · first seen 11 Sept 2026
model_01M294WVSY1RMKMYZRTPACJ73C
Overview
Identity
- Canonical model
- Yesidentity confidence: mediumOne row per real model release. Artifacts (checkpoints, quantisations, conversions) and folded evaluation variants point here.
- Official checkpoints
- official_checkpoints = hf_repo identifiers carried by the model itself; artifacts are separate entities pointing here through canonical_id.
- Artifacts
- None recordedSeparate entities (checkpoint · quantization · conversion · packaging) pointing to this model through canonical_id.
- Provider deployments
- 1
- API aliases
- inclusionai/ling-3.0-flashling-3-0-flashIdentifiers under which providers and evaluators refer to this model.
- Folded evaluation variants
- 0Effort / thinking variants (…-high, …-non-reasoning) are result configurations of this model, not separate models. Their old URLs redirect here.
Openness
Open weights— weights downloadable; 7 dimensions unknown.
Weights downloadable under a permissive or Creative Commons licence allowing commercial use; code or data may be missing.
Weights
Yes
Inference code
—
Training code
—
Training data
—
Dataset
—
Commercial use
—
Redistribution
—
Derivatives
—
dimensions marked null are unknown, not false
Key facts
- Release date
Source:OpenRouter public model & pricing listingT2observed 15 h agomedium
- Openrouter id
Source:OpenRouter public model & pricing listingT2observed 15 h agomedium
Architecture
- Hugging Face repo
Source:OpenRouter public model & pricing listingT2observed 15 h agomedium
Capabilities
Modalities
- Modalities
- text
- Input
- text
- Output
- text
Capabilities
Tool calling
Yes
OpenRouter public model & pricing listing · T2
Structured output
Yes
OpenRouter public model & pricing listing · T2
Reasoning
Yes
OpenRouter public model & pricing listing · T2
Vision
Unavailable
Audio
Unavailable
Fine-tuning available
Unavailable
- Context window
Source:OpenRouter public model & pricing listingT2observed 15 h agomedium
- Max output
Source:OpenRouter public model & pricing listingT2observed 15 h agomedium
Benchmarks10
Compare with another model →Comparable same task and conditions · Partially comparable same task, conditions differ (effort, temperature, judge) · Not comparable different variant or metric
Current rows only, grouped by benchmark → canonical metric → comparability group (task configuration). Effort variants folded into this model appear as rows of the same group. 10 current rows in total. “vs leader” compares with the current leader of the benchmark's primary group only; other groups are not directly comparable. Comparability rules →
Providers & Pricing1
All offers in the price terminal →USD per 1M tokens as published by each provider; native units (per-request fees, flex/priority tiers) are kept verbatim. Rows are append-only — every price change is kept in the history below. Cost of a workload →
Price history
Output price · USD / 1M tokens 1 provider
- OpenRouter
- OpenRouterfirst observed $0.06311 Sept 2026
Input price · USD / 1M tokens 1 provider
- OpenRouter
- OpenRouterfirst observed $0.02111 Sept 2026
Versions & Artifacts0
Version history
Context windowfirst observation only
11 Sept 2026current
Max outputfirst observation only
11 Sept 2026current
Opennessfirst observation only
11 Sept 2026current
Each hop is a claim: click a value for its source, tier and observation time. Nothing is overwritten — a new observation closes the previous claim.
Artifacts 0
No artifact (checkpoint, quantisation, conversion or packaging) points to this model yet.
Timeline5
Full timeline →Ling 3.0 Flash scores 55.43% on Terminal-Bench
artificial_analysisLing 3.0 Flash scores 42.01% on SciCode
artificial_analysisLing 3.0 Flash scores 23.68% on Humanity's Last Exam
artificial_analysisLing 3.0 Flash scores 85.45% on GPQA Diamond
artificial_analysisLing 3.0 Flash scores 24.94 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
artificial_analysis
Change history19
Viewing AI Atlas as of 11 Sept 2026 — attributes exactly as the atlas knew them on that day; later corrections are not shown.
Back to today →Attributes as of 11 Sept 2026 15 claims in force
- Release date
- 23 Jul 2026
- Openness
- open-weights
- Context window
- 262.1K tokens
- Max output
- 32.8K tokens
- Modalities
- text
- Input modalities
- text
- Output modalities
- text
- Hugging Face repo
- inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-flash
- Aa median output tokens per second
- 315.1
- Openrouter id
- inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash
- Reasoning
- Yes
- Structured output
- Yes
- Supported parameters
- frequency_penalty, include_reasoning, logit_bias, logprobs, max_tokens, min_p, presence_penalty, reasoning, repetition_penalty, response_format, seed, stop, temperature, tool_choice, tools, top_k, top_logprobs, top_p
- Tool calling
- Yes
Release daterelease_date1
Opennessopenness1
Context windowcontext_length1
Max outputmax_output_tokens1
Modalitiesmodalities1
Input modalitiesmodalities_input1
Output modalitiesmodalities_output1
Hugging Face repohf_repo1
Aa context windowaa_context_window1
Aa opennessaa_openness1
Descriptiondescription1
Aa median output tokens per secondmetric.aa_median_output_tokens_per_second1
Openrouter idopenrouter_id1
Openrouter listed atopenrouter_listed_at1
Reasoningreasoning1
Structured outputstructured_output1
Supported parameterssupported_parameters1
Tool callingtool_calling1
Weights availableweights_available1
Claims are temporal and append-only: a new observation closes the previous claim (valid_to) instead of overwriting it. Conflicting claims from different sources are kept side by side and flagged — never averaged. Methodology →
Provenance
Attributed facts
19
Source tiers
T219
Freshest observation
5 h ago
Conflicts
None
Source documents 2
Tier 1 = official/primary, 2 = quality secondary, 3 = community, 4 = unverified. Every snapshot is archived; see all sources and the methodology.
Data quality (60/100) measures how well AI Atlas knows this entity — completeness, primary-source ratio, freshness, conflicts — never how good the model is. Methodology →