Skip to content
AI Atlas

LiveBench Agentic Coding — cost vs performance

Best current row per canonical model in the group “average score · variant=Agentic Coding” (57 models) against context window (tokens). The dashed line is the Pareto frontier: no model is both better and cheaper than a point on it.

open / restricted weights closed Pareto frontier (6 models)

Frontier models 6

Pareto frontier
Modelaverage score on LiveBench Agentic CodingRankcontext window (tokens)ProviderTrust
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek · Open weights77.3%11MOfficial board
Grok 4.6xAI · Closed57.0%20500KOfficial board
gpt-5.2OpenAI · Closed50.3%33400KOfficial board
Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI · Open weights46.9%39262.1KOfficial board
Grok Build 0.1xAI · Closed45.8%42256KOfficial board
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic · Closed39.7%53200KOfficial board

Methodology. Points are the best current row per canonical model in comparability group 'average score · variant=Agentic Coding'. Price = cheapest current offer across providers (the provider shown). Pareto frontier maximises the score and minimises x; exact ties are all kept. memory_estimate is an estimate (see /methodology). Only the selected comparability group is plotted; points under other configurations are not mixed in. Price = cheapest current offer across providers at the time of the last crawl. Nothing is estimated except where marked.